I was making dinner last night, and noticed the packaging as I pulled the last individually quick frozen salmon fillet from the bag. A big allergy warning on the back said this:
Really? Salmon is a fish? Because I thought I was cooking up some rare form of chicken. Does the grocery store really think that's a necessary warning label?
I wanted to post this to participate in the Parent Bloggers Network's Wacky Warning Label Contest, mostly because I think it's hilarious. Plus, I happen to agree with these guys. So, what's the wackiest warning label you've seen lately?
4 Comments:
I wonder if a peanut butter jar needs to post a warning saying that it contains peanuts?
On a tube of chapstick:
"Do not put in eye."
Oh, I thought salmon just tasted like fish. Or is it chicken it tastes like?
LOL- it's because we're such a freaking sue happy society that they have to put stupid shit like that on labels. lol
Post a Comment